Javascript Menu by Deluxe-Menu.com
Turkey: Enhanced procedure to the case of Osman Murat Ülke
Connection e.V.
International Support of Conscientious Objectors and Deserters

Read More

(03.06.2014) 
Hülya Üçpınar: Türkei: Osman Murat Ülke wendet sich an das Verfassungsgericht - Antrag für das Recht auf Kriegsdienstverweigerung
(27.05.2014) 
Verein für Kriegsdienstverweigerung (VR-DER): Türkei: Treffen mit Berichterstatterin der Parlamentarischen Versammlung des Europarates - VR-DER legt Berichte zur Situation der Kriegsdienstverweigerer vor
(01.11.2013) 
Türkei: Es gibt viele Gründe Nein zu sagen - Männer und Frauen verweigern den Kriegsdienst - Kurzbeschreibung und Inhalt der Broschüre
(19.03.2013) 
Osman Murat Ülke: Türkei: Eine kleine Geschichte von fortgeschrittenen Techniken, Jahre zu vergeuden
(10.12.2012) 
Council of Europe – Committee of Ministers: Council of Europe: Decision to Conscientious Objection in Turkey - Urgent individual measures
(05.11.2012) 
Connection e.V.: Türkei: Osman Murat Ülke immer noch nicht legalisiert - Stellungnahmen und Beschluss des Ministerausschusses des Europarates
(26.09.2012) 
Council of Europe – Committee of Ministers: Decision to the case Ülke v. Turkey, September 2012
(26.09.2012) 
Ministerausschuss des Europarates: Türkei: Entscheidung zum Fall Ülke
(20.09.2012) 
Lawyer Hülya Üçpınar: Statement to ECHR Judgement Ülke v. Turkey
(20.09.2012) 
Rechtsanwältin Hülya Üçpınar: Stellungnahme zum Urteil des EGMR Ülke gegen Türkei
(06.09.2012) 
Regierung der Republik Türkei: Zur Umsetzung des Urteils des EGMR Ülke gegen Türkei
(06.09.2012) 
Government of the Republic of Turkey: Communication concerning the Execution of Ülke v. Turkey Judgment
(06.06.2012) 
Committee of Ministers of Council of Europe: Decision to the case of Osman Murat Ülke
(06.06.2012) 
Ministerausschuss des Europarates: Beschluss zum Fall Osman Murat Ülke
(10.05.2012) 
Kriegsdienstverweigerung in der Türkei - Kurzbeschreibung und Inhalt der Broschüre
(10.04.2012) 
Hürriyet Daily News: Türkei: “Verfassung sollte die Kriegsdienstverweigerung beinhalten“
(01.02.2012) 
Spagat mit offenem Ausgang - Kriegsdienstverweigerung in der Türkei und der Machtkampf zwischen Regierung und Armee - Link zur gwr-Redaktion
(23.11.2011) 
Işıl Cinmen: Türkei: Wegweisendes Urteil des Europäischen Gerichtshofes für Menschenrechte zur Kriegsdienstverweigerung
(22.11.2011) 
Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte: Das Fehlen einer Alternative zum Militärdienst in der Türkei verletzt das Recht auf Kriegsdienstverweigerung
(20.11.2011) 
Hürriyet Daily News: Türkei: Kriegsdienstverweigerung steht “nicht auf unserer Tagesordnung”
(15.11.2011) 
Today‘s Zaman: Türkei könnte die Kriegsdienstverweigerung entkriminalisieren
(23.09.2011) 
Ministerausschuss des Europarates: Türkei: Beschleunigtes Verfahren im Fall von Osman Murat Ülke
(06.10.2009) 
War Resisters International: Turkey: Legal amendments for conscientious objection?
(19.03.2009) 
Ministerausschuss des Europarates: Türkei/Europarat: Stellungnahme zum Fall Osman Murat Ülke
(19.03.2009) 
Committee of Ministers of Council of Europe: Turkey/Council of Europe: Statement to the case of Osman Murat Ülke
(01.09.2008) 
Osman Murat Ülke - Kurzportrait
(17.10.2007) 
Ministerausschuss des Europarates: Türkei: Zur Durchführung des Urteils des Europäischen Gerichtshofes für Menschenrechte (EGMR) im Verfahren Ülke
(01.08.2007) 
Beiträge zum Verweigerer Halil Savda
(31.07.2007) 
Connection e.V.: Türkei: Militär widersetzt sich im Fall Osman Murat Ülke Urteil des EGMR - Verweigerer Halil Savda frei - aber bedroht von weiterer Inhaftierung
(16.07.2007) 
Connection e.V.: Osman Murat Ülke droht erneute Inhaftierung - Urgent Action
(11.07.2007) 
Tony Fisher, Hülya Ücpinar und Kevin Boyle: Schreiben an den Ministerausschuss des Europarates - Betrifft: 39437/98 Urteil Ülke vom 24.01.2006
(06.06.2007) 
Ministerausschuss des Europarates: Türkei/Europarat: Stellungnahme zum Fall Osman Murat Ülke
(21.02.2007) 
Connection e.V.: Connection e.V. begrüßt Auszeichnung des türkischen Kriegsdienstverweigerers Osman Murat Ülke - Ehrung durch die IPPNW ist ein wichtiges Signal
(25.01.2006) 
Connection e.V.: Türkischer Kriegsdienstverweigerer unverhältnismäßig verfolgt - Urteil des Europäischen Gerichtshofes für Menschenrechte
(24.01.2006) 
Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte: Türkei: Osman Murat Ülke wird Entschädigung zugesprochen - Pressemitteilung des Europäischen Gerichtshofes für Menschenrechte
(24.01.2006) 
European Court of Human Rights Judgment Ülke v. Turkey - Prosecution of conscientious objector violates Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights
(02.11.2005) 
Interview mit Osman Murat Ülke: "Die Türkei ist ohne Zweifel ein Militärstaat"
(01.06.2004) 
Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte: Türkei: Klage des Kriegsdienstverweigerers Osman Murat Ülke angenommen
(01.09.1995) 
Osman Murat Ülke erklärt seine Kriegsdienstverweigerung - Wehrpassverbrennung am Antikriegstag

Turkey: Enhanced procedure to the case of Osman Murat Ülke

by Committee of Ministers of Council of Europe

Case description

Degrading treatment as a result of the applicant’s repetitive convictions between 1996 and 1999 and imprisonment for having refused to perform compulsory military service on account of his convictions as a pacifist and conscientious objector (substantive violation of Article 3).

Status of execution before the meeting

The applicant has been in hiding for a long time as a result of the continuing threat of prosecution. In 2007, despite the findings of the European Court in this case, he was again summonsed to serve his sentence. Since the adoption of the first interim resolution in October 2007, the Committee has been regularly examining the case at each of its human rights meetings. In the second interim resolution adopted in March 2009, the Committee strongly urged "the Turkish authorities to take without further delay all necessary measures to put an end to the violations of the applicant’s rights under the Convention and to make the legislative changes necessary to prevent similar violations of the Convention". Given that no tangible information had been provided on the measures envisaged, the Chairman of the Committee sent a letter to his Turkish counterpart in October 2009 conveying the Committee’s grave preoccupation regarding the absence of any information on the measures required in this case. In his reply of February 2010, the Turkish Minister of Foreign Affairs expressed the commitment of his authorities to executing the judgment of the Court and informed the Committee that work on legislative amendments was being conducted by the competent authorities. Subsequently, the Committee invited the Turkish authorities to provide concrete information on the announced legislative work. However, no concrete information was provided in this respect. At the 1100th meeting (November-December 2010), the Turkish authorities stated that the execution of this judgment raised certain difficulties since it required legislative amendments concerning military service. At the same meeting, the Committee once again invited the Turkish authorities to provide information on the development of the legislative process and to clarify whether the applicant is still being sought by the authorities to serve his previous sentences. No information was provided in this regard at the 1108th or 1115th meetings. At the 1115th meeting, having noted that no information had been provided, the Committee once again stressed the urgency and priority of the adoption of the necessary measures and strongly invited the authorities to give priority to the adoption of the necessary legislative measures without any further delay after the general elections of June 2011. At the same meeting, the Committee urged the authorities to provide information as to the applicant’s situation and invited them to clarify whether the applicant was still being searched for by the authorities to serve his previous sentences. By a letter of 20/07/2011, the applicant’s representative communicated to the Committee of Ministers a judgment rendered on 05/10/2009 by the Military Court of the Eskişehir 1st Air Forces Command which decided that the prison sentences imposed in two judgments previously rendered on 01/02/1999 and 09/03/1999 had become time-barred and could no longer be executed. However, with the same letter, the applicant’s representative also communicated a letter from the Office of the military prosecutor of the Eskişehir 1st Air Forces Command informing her that there was currently a valid arrest warrant against the applicant on account of a criminal investigation pending against him for desertion. According to the information submitted by the applicant’s representative, police officers visit the applicant’s mother’s house every three or six months and ask the applicant’s whereabouts. The last visit took place on 18/07/2011. The applicant’s representative claimed that those visits affected the applicant’s family members psychologically and provoked distress and anxiety.

Decisions

The Deputies,

1. noted that two previous judgments convicting the applicant on account of persistent disobedience became time barred and could not therefore be executed;

2. expressed grave concern with regard to the fact that there was currently a valid arrest warrant against the applicant on account of a criminal investigation pending against him for desertion;

3. stressed that the European Court in its present judgment found that “the numerous criminal proceedings brought against the applicant, the cumulative effects of the ensuing criminal convictions and constant alternation between prosecution and imprisonment together with the possibility that he would face prosecution for the rest of his life, are disproportionate to the aim of ensuring that he performs his military service”;

4. expressed further their grave concern that this judgment still remains to be executed;

5. recalled that Turkey has stated on numerous occasions that legislative measures were required not only to prevent similar violations but also to prevent the continuous prosecutions and convictions of the applicant (see Interim Resolution (2007)109);

6. strongly urged Turkey once more to take the necessary measures to execute this judgment;

7. insisted in this respect that Turkey informs the Committee of Ministers of the legislative measures required in time before the December DH meeting, including on their content and their time table for adoption;

8. decided to resume consideration of this item having in mind document CDDH(2008)014 addendum II.


Committee of Ministers of Council of Europe: Turkey: Enhanced procedure to the case of Osman Murat Ülke. Ülke v. Turkey, Application 39437/98, Final judgment 24/04/2006, September 23, 2011



Keywords:    ⇒ Conscientious Objection   ⇒ Jugdement   ⇒ Osman Murat Ülke   ⇒ Prosecution   ⇒ Turkey

Copyright if not stated otherwise: © Connection e.V.